Museum of Fine Arts in Houston | Reflection

Museum of Fine Arts in Houston Reflection ethnic ResponseThis cultural response essay will discuss my get by to the Museum of Fine Arts in Houston. I will be describing my positron emission tomography workings of art, comp ar two pieces of art by Do Ho Suh, and then describe my experience at the museum.The starting line part of the museum that I subverted was the Audrey J wizs Beck building on level 1. The exhibit was the Antiquities and American Art 1800-1970. I saw art given by Ima Hogg, Jackson Pollock, Severin Roesen, Louis Comfort Tiffany and Christian Edward Bottcher. I have visited the Hogg Plantation and being able to impersonate unmatched over the furniture and art that was given by Mrs. Hogg from her home was truly interesting. The first piece of art that caught my attention was in section 107 of this level. It was called the straight-laced Bouquet by the artisan Severin Roesen in circa 1850-1855. Roesen was an American artist exactly was born in Germany in 1815. The media of the artistic production is oil on canvas. The straitlaced Bouquet features a wide variety of exquisite flowers and fruit. It revives the 17th coke Dutch tradition of still-life portraits and paintings. The painting celebrates wealth, life, and aesthetic and physical comfort. It contains roses, poppies, morning glories, peonies, tulips, forget-me- nons, carnations, lilies, irises, peaches, raspberries, pomegranates, and a glass of wine among other topics. Roesen provides a feast for the senses. What I wonder most about this work is how vivid, possible, and beautiful he make the flowers and content of the picture. The b in effect(p) and rich colors chosen in contrast to the desolate background really create a beautiful melodic theme.The south fine art that I was impressed with was created by Louis Comfort Tiffany, who created the Tiffany lamps. This piece was in the alike(p) building merely in section 109. He was an American artist and developed Tiffa ny Studios in 1900. The name of the piece is A Wooden landscape in Three Panels created rough 1905. The medium is glass, copper-foil, and lead. A Wooden landscape painting is far more complex than any varnished glass windows I have seen, which be usually put in concert like a puzzle. Usually they are form together in multiple pieces with glass, unmatched on top of the other. This is just like a painter layered his paint of a canvas. Tiffany used subtle choices of color in this fine art which changes with the variations of light that it has been exposed to. Like a living landscape, this artistry changes in appearance responding to the light surrounding it. The thing that caught my attention about this artwork was the size. Its overall size is 7.2 x 11 feet. Another thing that I liked about this artwork was that it was stained glass. I love stained glass windows and how Tiffany did this was gorgeous. My dad has collected Tiffany lamps and so when I saw this artwork I recognized the styling and technique quickly.The Third portrait I put was in the same building as the other two but in section 113. The artist who created the work was Christian Edward Bottcher. Bottcher was a German artist who lived from 1818 to 1889. The name of the artwork was Summer Night on the Rhine which was created in 1862. The medium of the work was oil paint on canvas. It contained medieval castles, comely towns, friends gathered under a beautiful tree, and a vineyard one-sided down the side of a hill. The Rhine valley is an extremely romantic scene which was captured perfectly in this artwork where there is an exciting, charming, and nostalgic get-together. Laughter and felicitousness spill from the canvas and it makes you want to be a part of the celebration. The work sets the perfect shadowing and colors to reflect the mood of the painting. What I engraft to be charming about this scene is how all 15 or so men are trying to court the women and are loose them flowers. It is almost like an extremely large match-maker party. Another fun thing about this picture is where the party is taking place. You can quickly aver that they are all from the upper class because of their dress and the castle that they are beside, but the party is under a big tree with a table underneath. A chandelier is tied to a limb of a tree with rope. This is a very exquisite oil painting and I sat and wondered at its detail for a very long while.In the Caroline Wiess Law building, 2nd floor, gallery 200, I found the works of Do Ho Suh, a Korean artist living in America. The first piece I found was called go lede 1/5 which is 131 x 145 x 120 inches. It was created in 2008-2009 and is do up of ABS (plastic), basswood, beech, ceramic, enamel paint, glass, honeycomb board, lacquer paint, latex paint, LED lights, pinewood, plywood, resin, spruce, styrene, polycarbonate sheets and polyvinyl chloride sheets. The second piece of art created by Suh is called sign in spite of appearanc e a Home which was created in 2009. The dimensions of this piece are 131 x 145 x300 inches. It was created with resin. Do Ho Suh began using nylon and silk to create full size representations of his childhood home in Korea and his first American Apartment, a historical building in Providence, Rhode Island. The obvious quality of these materials creates the blurred line amid the past and present, inside and outside. Fallen Star 1/5 is an autobiographical representation of Suhs journey from Korea to the U.S. The artwork shows us a traditional Korean scholars manse that has crashed into the building that housed his first American apartment. Each object in the house has been hand made by Suh. He made the house and its contents as realistic as possible to create the effect of being lived in and something the informant can relate to. Home within a Home is a continuation of the piece Fallen Star. In the earlier work, the two buildings were very much separate entities but in Home within a Home, the Korean house and the apartment building have become a part of the same entity, growing and forming together as one. Suhs artwork is not trying to convey the idea of a violent collision between cultures, but rather about how they coexist together. He said by chance If you start to move things around, maybe the Korean house loses its identity, sort of blends in with the American style-or the other way around. I would love to build a house like this because it raises very interesting questions. Are you in a Korean house or an American house? Thats a invariant question to myself (MFAH description of artwork). some(prenominal) pieces of art symbolize the destroyed disused Korea coming together with the merging New Korea and America. Both pieces of art are easy to compare because of their connection that was created by the artist. Both represent the fib and journey of Do Ho Suh. They twain show what home delegacy to him and how he puts importance on his culture. The on ly big difference between the pieces is the materials used and the fact that Fallen Star they are two contrastive houses, and in Home within a Home they are put together and morphing into one house. My favorite out of the two is Fallen Star 1/5 because of how realistic it was. It took him 2 years to create this masterpiece and it is so amazing. I love how each room is made to take in lived in and creates this warm, at home atmosphere. On the outside of the building he uses an old style of architecture that I love and it was put together very intricately. There was a woman who was giving a hinderance to a middle school group and she described the artwork to them by comparing it to The Wizard of Oz. She did this because of how the Korean home is crashed into the apartment building. I thought this was humorous and helped the children relate more to the painting, Were not in Kansas anymore The one thing I found interesting about Home within a Home was the material used, resin. Just g azing at the piece, you could see right through it and could see every detail of the staircases, hallways, windows, and the roof of the Korean house while still being very detailed on the outside. Both pieces by Do Ho Suh were very interesting and thought provoking. I would recommend any of my class mates to go see them both as soon as possible.My experience at the Museum was very pleasant and I hope to go there again very soon. I drove there with my mom which created a good bonding epoch and made the experience even better for me. When we first entered Houston I was actually confused about which building the Museum was a part of and we ended up in the parking garage of the Houston Museum of Natural Science, oops Once we figured out where we actually needed to be, the right museum, we walked into the first room and were warmly greeted by the two women up front. I had a small, fun conversation with them both and they were extremely interested in my assignment and asked me about it and what I intend to do. Once they looked over my assignment sheet they informed me that my entrance into the museum would be free of charge. That was extremely nice of them to put that much importance into learning and reward students that way As my mom and I wandered aimlessly around the building taking in all there was to see, all of the employees greeted us and smiled. I noticed quickly that all of them were from different countries, mostly Asia and one man was even from Africa. While my mom and I walked around, we get turn around and confused as to where we were and every single employee we asked to help us was extremely kind. I have already recommended many of my friends to go visit this museum. The pieces of art I saw were amazing and I love that an fundamental law like this is as close to me as Houston. This trip was a striking experience but unfortunately I did not have the eon to stay and see all of the pieces and so I hope to go again very soon.