Saturday, April 6, 2019
Holey Soles Essay Example for Free
Holey Soles EssayThis case analysis all(a)ow for focus on the issues surround the modus vivendi product federation Holey Soles. Psychologist Ann Rosenberg founded the company in phratry 2002. She initially operated in her garage and backyard, until she recruited Joyce Groote (now current CEO of Holey Soles) and expanded the company into opposite split of North America. Holey Soles focuses on creating innovative footwear made from their trademarked technology SmartCel and SoleTek, which is an injection-molded foam technology.As of July 2007, sales had grown at 300% in each of the last two years and the company was ranked number four in the 2006 Profit magazine ranking of Canadas Emerging product Companies. However as they continue to operate, they find themselves getting pushed back by their number one competitor, Crocs. By mid-2007, Crocs sales were 33 times the sales of Holey Soles. Holey Soles has a revenue target of $40 million by 2009, and to achieve this target, they will urgency to focus on the issues surrounding their company and impeding its growth. We have decided that the core issue surround the company is how to reach the address of $40 million.They need to address the possible alternatives of either expanding into new(prenominal) products besides footwear, implementing a much aggressive marketing strategy, ever-changing their 2-year goals completely, or maintaining the status quo. These alternatives will depend on the assessment of the time carcass, cost, and current and potential competition. Upon analyzing all situations and alternatives, we have decided that the best solution for Holey Soles would be to expand the company by creating other product lines made form their trademarked technology. Only through this method will they be fitting to generate enough revenue to meet their $40 million goal.Issues The issues surrounding Holey Soles include the unfitness to have a high market share due to dominance from Crocs, how to reach th e goal of $40 million revenue, and deciding upon elaborateness. We think the core issue is how to reach the goal of $40 million. Decision Criteria1.Time frame of implementation They only have 2 years to make reach their intended goal of $40 million. Considering the high target number, 2 years is a very short time frame, and therefore is an grave decision criterion. Sourcing from China to other parts of the world in like manner takes a long time, so it factors in how much product can actually be made in the time frame given. 2.Cost of expansion To reach a goal of $40 million, an expansion of the company would have to take place. This poses the problem of where cracking is going to come from. 3.Current competition Their number one competitor is Crocs. During the 2-year period to reach a goal of $40 million, Crocs will still be selling at the rate they have been, and may also be working towards goals of expansion. 4.Threat of potential competition In the 2 year time frame given, wh ats to say that new competitors will not enter the market? As the clog fad continues, more companies are producing similar products as Holey Soles. Even though most of them aside from Crocs have a poorer design with lower quality materials, the possibility of a company suddenly entering with a firm new technology is always possible.Alternatives Assessments1.Expand by increasing a more diverse range of products sold. By relying on selling the clogs alone, they will never be able to reach their goal of $40 million, nor be able to overtake Crocs since Crocs has taken so much more of the market share already. With their trademarked foam-injection technologies SmartCel and SoleTek, they should charge those towards creating newer and more innovative lifestyle products aside from footwear. They already started with the beach bag, so it proves that it is possible to create other products. They already have an advantage due to their company being defined as products that are lifestyle cen tered, rather than simply a footwear manufacturer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment